Red Flags in Relationships and Data: More Similar Than You Think

We've all been there – that moment when something just doesn't feel right in a relationship. 

Maybe they're always late, or their stories don't quite add up.

In the world of data analysis, we face surprisingly similar situations. 

The parallels between relationship red flags and data quality issues are not just amusing coincidences – they're valuable frameworks for understanding how to approach problems in both domains.

1. Inconsistent Stories vs. Inconsistent Data

Remember that date who claimed to be a successful entrepreneur but couldn't explain what their company actually does? 

In data analysis, we call this inconsistency. 

Just last month, I was analyzing a dataset where 15% of customers reportedly made purchases worth over $50,000, yet their annual income was listed below $30,000

Like that date's vague answers, these numbers simply didn't add up.

Deep Dive into Inconsistencies

The problem goes deeper than just mismatched numbers. In a recent retail analysis:

  • 23% of orders showed delivery dates before purchase dates

  • 45% of returns were processed for items never shown as purchased

  • 12% of customer ages were listed as negative numbers

This mirrors relationship red flags where someone's story keeps changing.

Monday they were "working late," but their social media showed them at a concert. 

Both scenarios require the same approach: systematic fact-checking and documentation of discrepancies.

Deep Dive into Inconsistencies

The problem goes deeper than just mismatched numbers. In a recent retail analysis:

  • 23% of orders showed delivery dates before purchase dates

  • 45% of returns were processed for items never shown as purchased

  • 12% of customer ages were listed as negative numbers

This mirrors relationship red flags where someone's story keeps changing

Monday they were "working late," but their social media showed them at a concert. 

Both scenarios require the same approach

Systematic fact-checking and documentation of discrepancies.


2. Missing Important Dates vs. Missing Values

When your partner conveniently "forgets" your anniversary, it's a red flag. 

Similarly, when 40% of your customer feedback data is missing timestamps, you've got a problem. 

In a recent project, we found that critical satisfaction scores were missing for all customers who had filed complaints

just like how some partners mysteriously "lose" their phone when you need to have an important conversation.

The Impact of Missing Data

A closer look at missing values in a recent CRM database revealed:

  • 67% of churned customers had incomplete profile information

  • 82% of high-value leads were missing contact history

  • 34% of support tickets had gaps in their resolution timeline

These gaps tell a story similar to a partner who's never available during weekends or who has unexplained periods of absence. Both situations leave you with an incomplete picture and raise questions about reliability.

3. Too Good to Be True vs. Outliers

That profile claiming they're a 25-year-old neurosurgeon who models on weekends? 

Probably too good to be true. 

In data, we see this when numbers are suspiciously perfect. 

I once analysed a dataset where 100 users all reported exactly 98% satisfaction scores. 

Just like that too-perfect dating profile, these numbers warranted a deeper look.

Case Study: The Perfect Dataset That Wasn't

In a recent analysis of employee performance data:

  • All sales representatives reported exactly $100,000 in quarterly sales

  • Customer satisfaction scores were uniformly 5/5 for an entire month

  • Every project was marked as completed exactly on deadline

These perfect patterns are as suspicious as someone who claims they've never had a single argument in any previous relationship. Reality has variations and imperfections.

4. Ghost Behaviour vs. Null Values

Getting ghosted after what seemed like a great connection is frustrating. 

In data analysis, we call these mysterious disappearances "null values." 

In a recent sales dataset, 30% of high-value transactions ($100,000+) had null values in their follow-up fields


They simply vanished from our radar, just like that person who seemed so interested but never texted back.

The Ghost in the Machine

A detailed analysis of null values in a B2B platform showed:

55% of abandoned carts had no previous browsing history

78% of unfinished customer profiles had valid email addresses but no other data

25% of user sessions ended abruptly with no logout or timeout event


This pattern of disappearance mirrors modern dating phenomena where potential partners vanish without explanation, leaving analysts and daters alike wondering what went wrong.

5. Love Bombing vs. Data Flooding

Just as someone showering you with excessive attention early on can be suspicious, receiving an unusual surge of data should raise eyebrows. 


We once saw a 500% spike in user registrations over a single hour

Much like receiving 50 text messages on the first day of knowing someone. 

Both scenarios deserve careful investigation.

When More Isn't Better

Recent examples of data flooding include:

  • A sudden influx of 10,000 new user reviews in one day

  • Website traffic increasing 1000% without any marketing campaign

  • Customer service receiving 300 identical feedback submissions in an hour

These patterns often indicate automated or fraudulent activity, similar to love bombing in relationships

Intense but ultimately inauthentic attention.

6. The Ex Factor vs. Legacy Data

When someone constantly talks about their ex, it's a red flag. 

Similarly, when 60% of your current customer data still references outdated product codes from five years ago, you've got a "legacy data" problem. 

Both situations indicate an unhealthy attachment to the past that needs addressing.

The Cost of Living in the Past

Analysis of legacy data issues revealed:

  • 40% of active customer records still referenced discontinued products

  • 25% of current pricing was based on outdated market analysis

  • 15% of automated processes were using deprecated algorithms

Like a partner who can't move past their previous relationship, systems clutching onto legacy data prevent growth and adaptation.

7. Communication Issues vs. Integration Problems

Just as relationship problems often stem from poor communication

Data issues frequently arise from poor system integration. 

Consider these parallels:

  • Misinterpreted text messages vs. mismatched data formats

  • Speaking different languages vs. incompatible database schemas

  • Mixed signals vs. conflicting data definitions

Integration Nightmares

Recent integration challenges included:

- CRM systems showing different customer statuses across platforms

- Inventory counts varying by 30% between systems

- Order values being calculated differently across databases

The Solution: Trust Your Gut, But Verify

In both relationships and data analysis, the key is to:

  • Document the red flags (keep a log of suspicious patterns)

  • Cross-reference with other sources (talk to friends/compare multiple data sources)

  • Look for patterns (is this a one-time issue or a recurring problem?)

  • Take action before it's too late (clean your data/have that difficult conversation)

  • Implement preventive measures (set boundaries/create data validation rules)

  • Regular check-ins (relationship talks/data quality assessments)


    Practical Steps for Data Validation

1. Implement automated data quality checks

2. Create detailed documentation of expected data patterns

3. Establish clear protocols for handling anomalies

4. Set up regular data quality reviews

5. Develop a system for tracking and resolving issues


Building Trust Over Time

Just as healthy relationships are built on trust and transparency, reliable data systems require:

  • Consistent validation and verification

  • Regular maintenance and updates

  • Clear communication channels

  • Established boundaries and rules

  • Continuous monitoring and improvement

Remember, just as you wouldn't make a lifetime commitment to someone showing serious red flags, 

You shouldn't base critical business decisions on data that raises similar warning signs. 

In both cases, due diligence up front can save you from a world of trouble later.

The Power of Pattern Recognition

Whether in relationships or data analysis, pattern recognition is key.

The ability to spot red flags early can save time, resources, and emotional investment. 

By applying relationship wisdom to data analysis (and vice versa), we can build more robust systems and make better decisions in both our personal and professional lives.

The next time you're scrutinizing your data, think about how similar it is to evaluating a potential partner. 


Are you seeing those red flags? 

And more importantly, are you paying attention to them? 

Because in both cases, the signs are usually there – we just need to be willing to see them.

Need help identifying those red flags? Book a free no-obligation consultation with one of our data experts.



Previous
Previous

The Heartbreak of Unstructured Data: When Information Chaos Destroys Your Business

Next
Next

Showing Your Data Some Love: A Guide to Data Care by the Numbers